CO129-331 - Public Offices - 1905 — Page 502

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

let him know who the authorized officer is later.

That in the circumstances it seems undesirable to take an action on his drop: In view of para: 18 of RU 614- ... I think the C.O. should call their attention to §18. As there are other claimants, and no indemnity can be given for the Russian property before the Amended surrendered. I always thought that this ammunition was declared forfeited under §29 of the Arms Act, §29(g). We get to the Act of 28, 1862 §2(2) and §3 par 3 of the Secret Dept of 20 Jan 05. Still, it seems to me to show that this was otherwise; it would not presumably have been transferred to the Gunpowder Dept. If this were to go to the Govt under §2(2), the Gov can make an order under his hand directing delivery to the Russian Govt ship. The claimant can do nothing to prevent it. Of course, §4 of that Act shows that the Govt's order should direct delivery to her. No trouble can arise.

I think it is best to write to F.D. the prices for return, as above, in writing. Do not send M: Bland's letter HB 6711 to C.O. Tell them that we have not done so in view of para 18. Intimate to them that if they wish, we will ask C.O. whether it should be sent at once.

Edit History

2026-06-24 07:35:56 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

let him know who the authorized officer is later.That in the circumstances it seems undesirable to take an action on his drop: In view of para: 18 of RU 614- ... I think the C.O. should call their attention to §18. As there are other claimants, and no indemnity can be given for the Russian property before the Amended surrendered. I always thought that this ammunition was declared forfeited under §29 of the Arms Act, §29(g). We get to the Act of 28, 1862 §2(2) and §3 par 3 of the Secret Dept of 20 Jan 05. Still, it seems to me to show that this was otherwise; it would not presumably have been transferred to the Gunpowder Dept. If this were to go to the Govt under §2(2), the Gov can make an order under his hand directing delivery to the Russian Govt ship. The claimant can do nothing to prevent it. Of course, §4 of that Act shows that the Govt's order should direct delivery to her. No trouble can arise.I think it is best to write to F.D. the prices for return, as above, in writing. Do not send M: Bland's letter HB 6711 to C.O. Tell them that we have not done so in view of para 18. Intimate to them that if they wish, we will ask C.O. whether it should be sent at once.

Baseline (Original)

let him know who the authorized :fficer later.athat in the cises it seems undesirable ttakse an action his drop: In view of para: 18 ofраварthat dorp perhapinhad betternot bot send it 57=0. Pficiallymight lot the Chen a See it puratch.but wiДере RU 614- I think the 7.0. Curling of herk 392876_ calling their attention to §18? As there are other claimants, and notAn indemning be given Log the Russian The H. K. fort before the Amede in surrendered.MufurasGyer I always thought that this ammunition declared forfectesrammunition under 5.29 of the Ams ramme5.29g We get to the adu Are Kontno 28, 1862§2 (2)the Duititay stores adee 1 571862 §2(2) and 495/3 par 3 of fir In hatte secret derp of 20 Jan 05 Still seemstheCas to me to show that this was otherwise it wo not hesumably have been transfered to thened to the form Gunpowder defert. If this82(2)7 were to the Got under go the 7862 ordre can make an order under his hand spent- the Ruminfortfrit, delivery claimant can do anything: to prevent it. Of also & 4 of that I see thereforeCLindeafor taking Stuff is the perpertyy disposaly the Crownhe occaKĄ UTheaditheA Reussian Govt ship sha the Gor''s order shoIcall &drect deliver to her,Thamseor trouble can ToberveمنIthinkthenabove in writing to FD thead Vols containing the prices for setum, Do not send M: Bland's letter HB 6711 to 2.0. A tell them that we have not done so in view of pain 18. int if they wish We will ark mimo whether it taube at onceSent

2026-06-24 07:35:56 · Baseline

View content

let him know who the authorized

fficer

later. a

that in the

cises it seems undesirable t

takse an

action

his drop:

In view of para: 18 of

равар

that dorp perhap

had better

not bot send it 57=0. Pficially

might lot the Chen a See it puratch.

but wi

Дере

RU 614-

I think the 7.0. Curling of herk 392876_ calling their attention to §18

? As there are other claimants, and not

An indemning

be given

Log

the Russian

The H. K. fort before the Amede in surrendered.

Mufuras

Gyer

I always thought that this

ammunition

declared forfectes

rammunition

under 5.29 of the Ams ramme

5.29g

We get to the adu Are Kont

no 28, 1862 §2 (2)

the Duititay stores adee 1 571862 §2(2)

and

495

3 par 3 of fir In hatte secret derp of 20 Jan 05 Still seems

the

Cas

to me to show that this was otherwise it wo not hesumably have been transfered to the

ned to the form

Gunpowder defert. If this

82(2)7

were to

the Got under

the 7862 ordre can make an

order under his hand spent

- the Ruminfort

frit, delivery

claimant can do anything:

to prevent it. Of also & 4 of that

I see therefore

indea

for taking Stuff is the perpertyy disposaly the Crown

he occaKĄ U

The

adithe

A Reussian Govt ship sha

the Gor''s order sho

Icall &

drect deliver to her,

Tham

or trouble can

Toberve

من

Ithink

then

above in writing

to FD thead Vols containing the

prices for setum,

Do not send

M: Bland's letter

6711

to 2.0. A tell them that we have not done so in view of pain 18. int if they wish We will ark mimo whether it taube

CO129-331 - Public Offices - 1905 — Page 502

Edit History

Comments

Private Research Note